|
本帖最后由 mostakimseo05 于 2022-9-1 12:43 编辑
And this is because both works One and three chairs and Fontaine share the same concept . That is why they are called Conceptual Art, and as we will see, conceptual art was one of the most important vehicles for photography to obtain a full citizenship card in the art world. Photography conceptual art par excellence Of the visual media, for conceptual art because, as James Yoo rightly points out, it is the perfect medium to apply photography in endless extrapolations of its apparent neutrality, objectivity, literalness and connection to a certain shared reality, to take its ubiquity and turn it into something strange and provocative.
This ability to hide its artistic possibilities is crucial in e-commerce photo editing conceptual art. Photography in its apparent documentary nature can easily camouflage an authorial intention and provoke, more effectively, a provocation of the viewer by the photographer. Photography in this sense can question art in a particularly effective way, and let us not forget that conceptual art …cannot be defined in terms of medium or style, but rather in the way of questioning what art is. In particular, Conceptual Art challenges the art object as unique, collectible or saleable The very ability to have multiple copies of photography offers additional bravado to art conceived in its more traditional form.
Throwing Three Balls in the Air to Get a Straight Line Best of ThirtySix Attempts detail. After Duchamp, art is much more than creating something beautiful. Without a doubt, art can be beautiful, but not all art or all the time has to be. Art also becomes an intellectual possibility that is not always evident or understandable only on the visual level. For his part, Lemagny declares that …conceptual art is to reduce art to the interrogation that it drops on itself. Not to make art with ideas, but to make art an idea of art. In fact, not an idea, but a thinking about. An art that bites its tail.
|
|