|
本帖最后由 hmkhairul136 于 2022-7-20 13:30 编辑
In addition, if there is no restriction by any laws or government measures, but the parties to the contract decide to suspend work or isolate themselves in order to avoid the risk of infection. The application of force majeure clauses shall not be asserted. Article 2 , paragraph 4: "4. Tobacco advertising: refers to any form of commercial publicity, promotion, suggestion or action, the direct or indirect purpose or effect of which is to promote or promote the use of tobacco products to unspecified consumers." Article 2 , paragraph 5: "5. Tobacco sponsorship: refers to any form of donation to any event.
Activity or individual whose direct or indirect purpose photo color correction services effect is to promote or promote the use of tobacco products to unspecified consumers. " Article 9, paragraph 8 : "The promotion of tobacco products or the advertisement of tobacco products shall not be done in the following ways: ... 8. Tea parties, dinner parties, briefing sessions, tasting sessions, concerts, speech sessions, sports or public welfare, etc. events , or other similar means for publicity.” explain the contention Do the provisions of Article 2 , paragraphs 4 and 5, and Article 9, paragraph 8, of the Tobacco Harm Prevention Act violate the principle of legal clarity.
Paragraph 8 of Article 9 of the same law stipulates that restricting tobacco products companies from sponsoring any form of activities in the name of the company,does it infringe on the freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution? Paragraph 8 of Article 9 of the same law stipulates that restricting tobacco products companies from sponsoring any form of activities in the name of the company, does it violate the right to equality guaranteed by the Constitution? Does Explanation 2 of the Letter of Guojian Zi No. 1029911263 dated October 11, 102, issued by the National Health Administration of the Ministry of Health and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as the letter in dispute)
|
|